Annals of Translational Medicine

Introduction: Fighting the ventilator (FV) is characterized by a patients active counteraction of respiratory gas flow across multiple breaths during mechanical ventilation. An effective ventilation is prevented during such episodes. The objective of this exploratory study was to evaluate clinicians knowledge, perception and agreement regarding this condition. Methods: In a cross-sectional online survey, medical professionals with experience in intensive care medicine (mostly neonatal and pediatric patients) responded to 11 questions covering various clinical aspects of FV. Results: All respondents were familiar with the phenomenon and assessed it to be clinically relevant. Neonates were perceived to be predominantly affected. Promoting factors of FV included inadequate sedation and ventilation-associated factors. In clinical practice, the participants identified FV by clinical evaluation, analysis of ventilator waveforms and capnography and used both pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention strategies. There was no consensus concerning the English terminology of the condition. Only few respondents were familiar with local guidelines to manage FV. Conclusion: Although there was consensus on the relevance of FV, diagnostics and management strategies were highly heterogeneous. Many participants agreed that poor patient-ventilator synchrony was an important cause of FV. Future work should focus on characterizing and generating evidence on FV.

Purpose: Posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) thickening is a common structural manifestation of treatment-related internal lymphedema in patients with head and neck cancer and can be evaluated using lateral videofluoroscopic images acquired during modified barium swallow (MBS) studies. However, no standardized method currently exists for quantitative measurement. Methods: This two-phase methodological study first conducted a scoping review to characterize existing approaches to PPW thickness measurement and identify the principal factors contributing to variation in PPW thickness measurement. Eight studies were identified with variation observed across these measurement factors. An empirical reliability study was then performed using 107 MBS studies from 93 Head and Neck Cancer patients. Two independent raters annotated 10 anatomical landmarks on pre-swallow and post-swallow resting frames, and a computer-assisted algorithm quantitatively generated seven candidate PPW thickness measurements based on different vertebral reference points and measurement directions. Reliability was assessed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Inter-rater reliability was highest for the measurement originating from the midpoint of C3 and extending perpendicular to the anterior C3 surface (ICC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Among the normalization references, C2-C4 vertebral length demonstrated greater reliability than C3 vertebral length, with an ICC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91). No significant differences were observed between pre-swallow and post-swallow PPW thickness measurements across the evaluated approaches. Conclusions: These findings provide a methodological foundation for more standardized and reliable quantification of PPW thickness, with potential to expand the role of MBS from the functional evaluation of swallowing to include quantitative characterization of pharyngeal structural abnormalities.

Computed tomography (CT) interpretation requires recognition of the anatomical level of each slice. Classification may facilitate preprocessing and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. We developed deep learning models to classify craniofacial CT slices into six anatomical categories. A total of 11,769 images were collected from a multicenter database involving 10 Japanese university hospitals and the public Head-Neck-Radiomics-HN1 dataset. Patients were divided into training (70%) and evaluation (30%) sets. Five CNN architectures were trained from scratch, and hard- and soft-voting ensembles were evaluated. Individual-model accuracy ranged from 94.72% to 96.09%; the hard-voting ensemble achieved 96.46% accuracy (Cohen's k = 0.954). Although performance differed among individual models (Cochran's Q = 99.29, p < 0.001), the ensemble did not significantly outperform EfficientNetV2B1 (McNemar's p = 0.163). Errors occurred mainly between adjacent anatomical regions. Deep learning can classify craniofacial CT slices accurately and may support automated dataset organization and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. External validation is needed.

Objectives To evaluate discrepancies between radiologists and referring physicians in the interpretation of diagnostic probabilities conveyed by common Japanese expressions used in radiology reports. Materials and Methods Fifteen expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities in radiology reports were selected by five attending radiologists. An anonymous online survey was distributed to 26 radiologists and 33 referring physicians at a single institution. Participants assigned a diagnostic probability (from 0% to 100% in 10% increments) to each expression. Differences in median probabilities between radiologists and referring physicians were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Variability in interpretation was assessed using interquartile range (IQR), with IQR [&ge;] 30% defined as substantial variability. Results All radiologists (26/26) and 97% of referring physicians (32/33) completed the survey. Seven of the 15 expressions showed statistically significant differences in interpretation between radiologists and referring physicians: "c/w" (80% vs. 60%; p = 0.031), the Japanese equivalents of "present" (100% vs. 100%; p = 0.024), "suspect of" (80% vs. 70%; p = 0.007), "possibly" (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.001), "unlikely" (10% vs. 10%; p = 0.022), "cannot be ruled out" (25% vs. 40%; p < 0.001), and "not inconsistent with" (80% vs. 90%; p = 0.008). Substantial variability in interpretation (IQR [&ge;] 30%) was observed for four expressions: "cannot be ruled out" (IQR, 10%-40%), "s/o" (IQR, 60%-90%), "c/w" (IQR, 50%-90%), and "not inconsistent with" (IQR, 70%-100%). Conclusion This study revealed that nearly half of the Japanese expressions commonly used to convey diagnostic probabilities were interpreted differently by radiologists and referring physicians. These discrepancies highlight the need for a standardized lexicon to improve clarity and consistency in radiology reporting.

Objective: Current guidelines recommend different adjuvant treatment strategies for women with endometrioid early stage endometrial cancer exhibiting a p53 abnormal pattern. We aimed to evaluate recurrence patterns and explore the clinical implications for adjuvant therapy in this population. Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 86 patients with endometrioid, p53 abnormal, FIGO stage I, II endometrial cancer treated between 2013 and 2023 at six hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Clinicopathologic data were collected through medical record review. Progression free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: The 12, 24, and 36 month PFS rates were 91%, 78%, and 76%, respectively. Among the 16 patients who experienced recurrence, 12 (75%) had distant metastases. Adjuvant chemotherapy showed a trend toward improved PFS compared with adjuvant radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy (p=0.10). In multivariable analysis, the p53 overexpression pattern was independently associated with worse PFS compared with the p53 null pattern (HR 8.59, 95% CI 1.61 to 45.79, p=0.01). Conclusion: Given the poor PFS, the predominance of distant recurrence and the observed trend toward improved PFS with chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in women with endometrioid early stage endometrial cancer exhibiting a p53 abnormal pattern. Further studies are warranted to clarify the prognostic impact of p53 abnormality subtypes.

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is the standard minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Conventional multiport robotic surgery is widely applied yet associated with more abdominal trauma and postoperative discomfort. Single-port robotic surgery can further minimize surgical injury. The domestic KangDuo robotic system has been gradually used in urological oncology, but high-level prospective evidence comparing single-port and multiport extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy remains scarce. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two surgical approaches. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized, non-inferiority trial. Eligible patients diagnosed with cT1c-cT2cN0M0 localized prostate cancer will be randomized to receive either single-port (experimental group) or multiport (control group) extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy using the KangDuo system. All participants will receive standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The primary endpoint is postoperative positive surgical margin rate. Perioperative parameters, postoperative recovery, medium-term functional recovery and oncological outcomes will be assessed comprehensively. Expected results: We hypothesize that the single-port approach is non-inferior to the multiport approach in terms of oncological radical effect. The single-port technique is expected to provide better minimally invasive benefits, with comparable perioperative safety, urinary/sexual function recovery and mid-term oncological outcomes between groups. Conclusions: This randomized trial will provide high-quality clinical evidence for the application of domestic single-port robotic surgery. The findings will facilitate individualized surgical selection for patients with localized prostate cancer. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600125669 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=2600125669).

High attrition rates across clinical drug development impose immense clinical and financial burdens, yet prospectively forecasting whether an individual trial will achieve its primary endpoint remains challenging. Here we present a machine-learning system that predicts clinical trial success across phases I-IV, independently modeling studies with efficacy versus safety/toxicity primary endpoints. To prevent lookahead bias and outcome leakage, models are trained on registration-time features, including target and mechanism-of-action precedent, drug modality and novelty, trial design and operational characteristics, and frozen literature-derived target-choice embeddings. Each prediction yields a continuous Predictive Trial Index (PTI) between 0 and 1 reflecting success probability. On a test set of trials initiated in 2021 or later, the efficacy model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.828 (95% CI 0.812-0.845; n = 2,347) and the safety/toxicity model reached 0.809 (95% CI 0.787-0.831; n = 1,485). These models are embedded in inClinico Agent, an agentic AI system integrating frontier large language models (LLMs) with deterministic scoring engines, retrieval tools and specialized clinical skills. We also introduce ClinBench, a prospective benchmark of 2,040 ongoing trials evaluated by inClinico Agent and five frontier LLMs, establishing a leakage-free foundation for tracking prospective predictive accuracy as trials reach completion.

Objectives: Using a nationally representative database of U.S. hospitalizations, we aimed to (1) characterize contemporary trends in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) prevalence by severity, therapeutic hypothermia (TH) utilization, and associated in-hospital mortality; and (2) examine the association between TH and mortality by HIE severity and gestational age (GA), focusing on 35- and 36-weeks GA. Methods: We analyzed newborn hospitalizations from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2023. Unspecified, mild, moderate, and severe HIE were identified using ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes P91.60-P91.63; and 35- and 36-weeks GA using codes P07.38-P07.39. TH was identified using ICD-10-PCS codes 6A4Z0ZZ and 6A4Z1ZZ. Survey-weighted multivariable generalized linear models with marginal standardization were used to estimate adjusted mortality risk differences (RD) with surprisal (S) values, and assess whether associations between TH and mortality differed by HIE severity across GA strata. Results: Among 29,767,238 hospital discharges, HIE was identified in 66,535 neonates (2.24 per 1,000), and TH used in 19.2% of HIE cases. In-hospital mortality was 9.74% among all HIE cases and 6.65% among TH-treated neonates. From 2016-23, HIE prevalence nearly doubled (1.58 to 3.01 per 1,000; p-for-trend <0.001) and TH utilization more than doubled (0.33 to 0.74 per 1,000; p-for-trend <0.001), while TH use as a proportion of HIE remained stable (17.8%-20.8%; p-for-trend=0.39). HIE severity distribution was: mild (15%), moderate (29.4%), severe (18.3%), and unspecified (37.3%), with moderate HIE increasing over time (22.3%-33.5%). Crude mortality was consistently highest for severe HIE (range: 33.65%-35.25%). Among infants with severe HIE, TH was associated with reduced mortality overall (RD -10.12%; 95% CI -14.86, -5.39; p<0.001; S=15.12), and specifically at 36-weeks GA (RD -21.98%; 95% CI -35.85, -8.12; p=0.002; S=9.06), but not at 35-weeks (RD -1.83%; 95% CI -21.2, 17.55; p=0.86; S=0.22). Conclusions: TH was associated with mortality reduction in severe HIE overall and at 36-weeks GA, but this benefit remains uncertain at 35-weeks GA.

The -Bonacci weighted sequence space {ell}(,) is introduced for [&ge;] 2, 1 [&le;] < {infty}, and > 0). It is proved to be a Banach space which is isometrically isomorphic to {ell}, with an unconditional Schauder basis. The space is also reflexive and uniformly convex. Its strict inclusion chain, continuous dual, and asymptotic truncation estimate of order - / are also established. Based on this framework, Scaled &#119898-BonacciNet is proposed as a lightweight CNN that rescales Fibonacci-Net channels using the dominant &#119898-Bonacci root and employs depth wise separable convolutions. Tribonacci-Net achieved 96.09% accuracy and a 0.9581 macro F1-score on the 15-class Brain MRI dataset using 0.85 million parameters and 0.366 GFLOPs. Pentanacci-Net attained 95.87% accuracy on the 44-class dataset while reducing parameters and FLOPs by 47.10% and 44.48%, respectively. On the CKD ultrasound dataset, Hexanacci-Net achieved 83.75% accuracy and a 0.7941 macro F1-score, with corresponding reductions of 50.37% and 45.10%. These findings support dominant-root scaling as a structured approach to lightweight CNN design.

Abstract Background: Respiratory failure (RF) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) often occur together in older adults, but long-term national mortality trends for the two conditions combined have not been described. We examined trends and disparities in deaths with co-listed RF and AF/AFL among U.S. adults aged 65 years and older from 1999 to 2024, and projected rates through 2035. Methodology: We used the CDC WONDER Multiple Cause of Death database to identify deaths with ICD 10 codes J96 (RF) and I48 (AF/AFL) listed together. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 were standardized to the 2000 U.S. population and stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, census region, urbanization, state, and place of death. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate annual percent changes (APCs) and average annual percent changes (AAPCs). Forecasts for 2025 to 2035 were generated with an exponential smoothing (ETS) model. Results: A total of 433,598 deaths were recorded. The overall AAMR rose from 12.8 in 1999 to 66.7 in 2024 (AAPC 8.11%; 95% CI, 7.35 to 8.87; P < 0.0001). Three segments were identified: an increase from 1999 to 2018 (APC 7.73%), a sharp rise from 2018 to 2021 (APC 18.10%), and a decline from 2021 to 2024 (APC -5.25%). Males had a higher AAMR and a steeper increase than females (AAPC 8.44% vs 7.81%). Non-Hispanic White adults had the highest mean AAMR, Hispanic adults had the largest relative increase (AAPC 8.72%), and Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander adults had the smallest (AAPC 6.23%). The Midwest had the fastest regional growth (AAPC 9.35%). From 1999 to 2020, non-metropolitan areas increased faster than metropolitan areas (AAPC 10.09% vs 8.21%). State AAMRs ranged from 24.7 in Ohio to 85.1 in Louisiana. Most deaths occurred in hospital inpatient settings (64.1%), followed by nursing homes (14.1%) and the home (11.9%). The model projects an AAMR of 122.96 per 100,000 by 2035 (95% prediction interval, 85.42 to 160.50). Conclusions: Mortality involving RF with AF/AFL among older U.S. adults increased more than fivefold over 25 years, with a marked surge during the COVID 19 period and only a partial decline afterward. Differences by sex, race/ethnicity, region, and urbanization point to groups that may benefit from earlier detection and coordinated cardiopulmonary care.

Purpose: To compare the performance of three large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT-o1, Grok 3, and Gemini 2.0 Pro, on the American College of Prosthodontists' National Prosthodontic Resident Examination (NPRE). Materials and Methods: Official NPRE examinations from years 2015-2024 were retrieved from the American College of Prosthodontists website and used to prompt each LLM. Paid access tiers and advanced reasoning were enabled. Responses from LLMs were recorded and compared against the official answer keys for accuracy, variability across years, and consistency of responses. Duplicate questions were retained for the primary analysis and removed in a sensitivity analysis. Accuracy (percent correct) was compared using generalized estimating equations binary logistic regression (primary); Cochran's Q with Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar tests (sensitivity). Year-to-year variability (SD of annual accuracy) was compared using weighted Levene tests. Consistency across duplicate items was quantified as the percentage of perfect matches and compared using Cochran's Q with Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar tests. Results: Across 1,487 questions, overall accuracy differed among models (global P < 0.001). ChatGPT-o1 achieved 78.4% correct, Grok 3 76.4%, and Gemini 2.0 Pro 73.2%; ChatGPT-o1 and Grok 3's accuracy significantly exceeded Gemini 2.0 Pro (both P [&le;] 0.016), with no significant difference between ChatGPT-o1 and Grok 3 (P = 0.099). After removing duplicates (n = 1,200), results were similar: ChatGPT-o1, Grok 3, and Gemini 2.0 Pro were 77.1%, 76.6%, and 71.5% correct, respectively; ChatGPT-o1 and Grok 3's accuracy was significantly higher than Gemini 2.0 Pro (both P < 0.001). Variability across years did not differ significantly (P [&ge;] 0.097). Grok 3 showed significantly higher perfect-match consistency (79.2%) than ChatGPT-o1 (69.4%) and Gemini 2.0 Pro (64.5%) (P [&le;] 0.010). Conclusions: Contemporary LLMs showed 70-80% accuracy on postgraduate prosthodontic multiple-choice content. While promising for educational support, residual error and inconsistency warrant human oversight and transparent methods reporting before curricular adoption.

Background: Conventional performance metrics do not indicate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-platforms and radiologists are right or wrong on the same examinations, nor whether their non-agreement is more often beneficial or harmful. Objective: To develop, illustrate, and apply directional metrics quantifying non-agreement between radiologists and AI-platforms against a common reference standard, and to adapt a fragility-based framework for quantifying the statistical robustness of these metrics. Methods: We defined Positive Non-Agreement (PNA, AI-platform correct, radiologist incorrect), Negative Non-Agreement (NNA, radiologist correct, AI-platform incorrect), and Net Non-Agreement (NENA, their difference). Metrics were illustrated in three hypothetical scenarios of 1,000 examinations each and applied to three previously published AI-radiologist studies on pulmonary embolism and mammography. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated, and a reclassification fragility index (FI) quantified the minimum case reclassification needed to remove statistical support for NENA's direction. Results: In illustration, NENA was positive in two scenarios and negative in one. In the three published studies, NENA ranged from -4.18% to +10.74% and decreased consistently with increasing radiologist experience (junior residents, +6.27%; consultants, +1.45%), a gradient driven primarily by declining PNA with modest increase in NNA. The reclassification FI was defined for all three illustrative scenarios (range, 0.10%-1.70%) and for six of the seven comparisons from these studies (range, 0.34%-4.31%), but not for the weakest comparison, whose confidence interval for NENA included zero. Conclusions: PNA, NNA, and NENA provide a directional, case-level complement to conventional performance metrics for AI-radiologist non-agreement. The accompanying reclassification FI offers a statistically grounded, generalizable method for quantifying their robustness.

Purpose To evaluate the external transportability of source-derived probability calibration for chest radiograph deep learning classifiers under distribution shift and determine its dependence on sample size and disease prevalence. Materials and Methods This retrospective secondary computational analysis of public, de-identified radiographic datasets involved no participant contact or new data collection. Cohort sizes were prespecified by availability without prospective power calculation: 106,686 NIH ChestX-ray14 images (29,323 patients; 1992-2015) for development and internal testing, 20,000 CheXpert images (20,000 patients; October 2002-July 2017), and 14,998 VinBigData images (2018-2020) for external testing. ResNet-18, DenseNet-121, and DeiT-Tiny classifiers for cardiomegaly and pleural effusion were trained across four patient fractions and three seeds (36 fits). Calibrators were fitted exclusively on NIH data. Twelve primary external Brier-score contrasts (temperature-scaled versus raw probabilities) were evaluated using paired cluster-bootstrapping with Holm adjustment. Results Temperature scaling reduced Brier scores in nine of 12 primary contrasts but worsened pleural effusion calibration on VinBigData across all architectures (Brier increases: ResNet-18, 0.001460 [95% CI: 0.001347, 0.001568]; DenseNet-121, 0.001193 [95% CI: 0.001109, 0.001274]; DeiT-Tiny, 0.000498 [95% CI: 0.000417, 0.000577]; all adjusted P=.006). Standardizing class weights to NIH prevalence reversed all CheXpert improvements. Although full versus 10% training improved external AUROC across all comparisons, DeiT-Tiny CheXpert pleural effusion Brier score worsened by 0.007039 despite a 0.032466 AUROC gain. At 80% selective image retention, calibrated ensembles retained only 12.3%-17.2% of VinBigData positive pleural effusion examinations. Conclusion Source-fitted calibration is not uniformly transportable across health systems, and discrimination gains do not guarantee calibrated probabilities. External evaluation must simultaneously assess probability reliability, prevalence shifts, and retained-case composition.

Objectives: To determine how strongly clinical referral text, rather than image content, drives the decisions of multimodal large language models (LLMs) differentiating glioma from brain abscess on MRI. Materials and methods: This retrospective single-center study included 60 contrast-enhanced T1-weighted brain MRI examinations (30 gliomas, 30 abscesses; reference-standard diagnosis). One axial slice per case was paired with five referral texts (explicitly inflammatory to explicitly tumor-suggestive) under three prompt instructions and submitted 20 times each to GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, and Qwen 3.6 (72,000 answers). The primary outcome was the text-driven span (difference in tumor-call frequency between explicit inflammatory and explicit tumor text). Two blinded radiologists classified the images without text; sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared descriptively. Results: Patients (29 women) had a mean age of 55.8 +/- 16.4 years. With neutral text, models answered tumor in 45-67% of queries (specificity, 0.38-0.78), versus 52% and 60% for radiologists (specificity, 0.77 and 0.63). The text-driven span was 0.79-1.00 (p < 0.001 for all models), whereas confirmed gliomas and abscesses differed by only 0.01-0.10 in three models and 0.25 in Gemini 3.5 Flash. Subtle wording produced at least 83% of the span in three models. An instruction to ignore the text reduced the span to 0.48-0.70 in three models and to 0.04 in Gemini 3.5 Flash, partly through reversion to a tumor default. Model accuracy was 0.52-0.73 versus 0.78 and 0.73 for radiologists. Conclusion: Multimodal LLMs deferred to referral text over imaging evidence in differentiating glioma from brain abscess, and prompt instructions did not reliably correct this.

Background: The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index integrates systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and immune function. We evaluated its association with survival in primary lung malignancies. Methods: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 18 September 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Hazard ratios (HRs) were synthesized using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regression examined robustness and heterogeneity. Results: Eleven studies contributed 13 cohorts to the overall survival (OS) analysis and 8 cohorts from seven studies to a combined recurrence/progression-free survival (RFS/PFS) analysis. Lower CALLY was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.12; I2=71.6%) and poorer RFS/PFS (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40-1.84; I2=0%). Associations persisted in leave-one-out analyses. No statistically significant subgroup differences were detected. Funnel-plot asymmetry suggested small-study effects for OS and RFS/PFS. Seven studies had moderate and four had high overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was rated as low for both OS and RFS/PFS, primarily due to risk of bias, heterogeneity, and endpoint indirectness. Conclusion: Lower CALLY was associated with adverse survival outcomes in the current synthesis. Methodological limitations and variation in biomarker measurement and endpoint definitions restrict interpretation. Prospective validation using standardized measurements and clinically coherent outcomes is needed to establish incremental prognostic value and clinical utility. Keywords: CALLY index; lung cancer; prognosis; overall survival; systematic review; meta-analysis

Background: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have distinct toxicity profiles across generations. Aims: To investigate relationships between EGFR-TKI physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties and drug-specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using national and global pharmacovigilance data. Methods: ADRs for erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib were extracted from the UK MHRA Yellow Card scheme and WHO VigiAccess. Disproportionality analysis used reporting odds ratios (RORs). Signals were defined as ROR >2, lower 95% confidence interval >1 and >3 cases. Drug properties were curated from ChEMBL, emc, SmPC and EMA sources. Results: VigiAccess contained 88,662 individual case safety reports (163,619 ADRs) and Yellow Card contained 752 reports (1,814 ADRs). Four System Organ Class (SOC) signals were identified in VigiAccess and three in Yellow Card, with five additional Yellow Card Preferred Term signals. Eye disorders showed the strongest consistent association with erlotinib (VigiAccess ROR 4.33; Yellow Card ROR 4.18). Osimertinib was associated with pneumonitis (ROR 7.67) and pulmonary embolism (ROR 3.94). Afatinib showed psychiatric disorder signals in both databases (ROR 3.2-3.3) and diarrhoea (ROR 2.79). Neoplasm-related signals likely reflected confounding by indication. Conclusions: EGFR-TKIs demonstrate generation-specific pharmacovigilance profiles. Integration with drug properties supports mechanistic plausibility for several signals, while the atypical afatinib psychiatric association warrants further investigation. Findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in controlled observational or mechanistic studies.

Background and Objective: Adding belzutifan to adjuvant pembrolizumab improved disease-free survival (DFS) in LITESPARK-022, but its durability beyond the 1-year treatment is unknown. Methods: Following a registered plan, we reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves of ten phase 3 adjuvant renal cell carcinoma trials. Within each trial, we estimated restricted mean survival time differences ({Delta}RMST), hazard ratios (HRs) before and after planned treatment ended, and DFS differences. Key Findings and Limitations: In LITESPARK-022 (central review), the 24-month {Delta}RMST was 1.34 months (95% confidence interval 0.73-1.95), and the belzutifan arm remained ahead after month 12 ({Delta}RMST increment 0.74 months/yr, 0.32-1.19). The HR was 0.55 (0.43-0.71) before month 12 and 1.16 (0.87-1.54) afterwards (post/pre ratio 2.10); investigator assessment showed similar attenuation. Similar ratios occurred in KEYNOTE-564 at its first interim analysis (2.02), whose benefit persisted, and in SORCE and PROTECT (2.09, 2.59), whose benefit faded. From months 12 to 30 (post hoc), the DFS difference changed by -3.7 percentage points (-8.1 to 0.8) with central review and 0.6 (-4.0 to 5.0) with investigator assessment. Data were reconstructed, and follow-up was short. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Relative hazard reductions with belzutifan were greater before month 12; durability of the absolute DFS advantage is uncertain and assessment-dependent, so single-HR projections should be avoided.

Purpose: To evaluate the associations of the numerical AI-CO center index and visually classified central dark-area extent with Humphrey 10-2 mean deviation (MD). Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 320 eyes of 169 patients with AI-CO imaging, broad-field 24-2F or 30-2 testing, and 10-2 testing. Both visual field examinations were performed within 365 days before or after AI-CO imaging. Two ophthalmologists independently classified central dark-area extent into five Levels (0-4). Analyses assessed Spearman correlations, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), distributions across final central dark-area Levels, and interrater reliability. Patient-cluster bootstrap confidence intervals and a one-eye-per-patient sensitivity analysis addressed inclusion of both eyes. Results: AI-CO center correlated with 10-2 MD (rho=0.829; 95% CI, 0.773-0.873). AUCs for 10-2 MD below -2, -6, and -12 dB were 0.902, 0.939, and 0.961, respectively. The numbers of eyes in Levels 0-4 were 66, 57, 94, 53, and 50; median 10-2 MD values were -0.59, -1.48, -3.54, -6.24, and -18.15 dB, respectively. Quadratic-weighted kappa was 0.970 (95% CI, 0.958-0.981). Sensitivity analyses yielded broadly similar findings. Conclusions: The numerical AI-CO center index and visually classified central dark-area extent were associated with central visual field damage. Assessing the extent of dark regions in the central image alongside the numerical index may provide useful information for interpreting central visual field status from the AI-CO display.

Incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is increased in patients admitted for brain injury. Staphylococcus aureus appears to be a particularly common pathogen in these respiratory infections. Our aim was to confirm the extent of S. aureus involvement in VAP among patients with neurological injuries. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including patients with and without neurological injuries who developed VAP during their ICU stay. Among 15 702 patients admitted in the participant centers during the study period. 407 were finally included in the study. S. aureus was involved in 122 (61.6%) VAP in brain-injured patients and 63 (30.1%) of non-brain-injured patients. In brain-injured patients, multivariate analysis identified age (0.97 [0.95; 0.98]), antibioprophylaxis (0.31 [0.18; 0.53]; p < 0.0001), subarachnoid hemorrhage (2.18 [1.01; 4.68]; p=0.0461), lower Glasgow coma score (0.92 [0.87; 0.97]; p= 0.004) and SAPS II (0.98 [0.97; 1]; p=0.0174) as critical factors associated with the risk of S. aureus in VAP. In the non-brain-injured population, multivariate analysis identified antibioprophylaxis (0.38 [0.22; 0.65]; p=0.0006), age (0.96 [0.95; 0.98]; p<0.0001), SAPS II (0.98 [0.97; 1]; p=0.0265), thoracic surgery (0.21 [0.09; 0.48]; p=0.0002) and peripheral neurosurgery (1.95 [1.2; 3.19]; p=0.0076) as critical factors. A total of 172 patients (42.3%) died during their ICU stay and 90-days mortality was 194 (47.7%). No difference of mortality was noticed function of VAP-associated pathogen.

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) screening is critical for personnel deploying to Antarctica, where geographic isolation and limited medical care make the management of acute cardiovascular events challenging. The utility of contemporary risk prediction tools such as the AHA PREVENT equations in this unique population remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 154 individuals referred for enhanced CV evaluation before deployment to the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP). Participants were evaluated across three temporal cohorts (2018-2020, 2021-2023, and 2024-2026). Demographics, CV risk factors, cardiac testing, and deployment clearance outcomes were collected. Risk was estimated using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), AHA/ACC Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), and AHA PREVENT risk models. Results: The cohort was predominantly male (79.9%; mean age 44.6 {+/-} 14.6 years), and abnormal ECG was the most common referral trigger (70.8%). Median 10-year risk was low by PREVENT and FRS and borderline elevated by PCE (PREVENT 2.7% [IQR 1.1-6.6], FRS 2.3% [IQR 0.5-7.1], and PCE 6.1% [IQR 2.4-9.2]). Among 72 participants with all scores, 51% were classified discordantly; PREVENT ASCVD agreed closely with FRS (=0.77) but poorly with PCE (=0.24-0.35), which consistently estimated higher risk. PCE was calculable in 52.6% versus 70.8% for PREVENT. Overall, 132 participants (85.7%) were cleared for deployment, while 8 (5.2%) were not physically qualified (NPQ); 6 of these NPQs were due to cardiovascular causes. Of 22 cardiac medical evacuations during the study period, 21 involved individuals without prior advanced cardiovascular screening. One screened individual was evacuated for symptoms subsequently found to have no cardiac cause. Conclusions: Risk calculators disagree substantially in the fitness-selected population. We recommend PREVENT as the primary risk-stratification tool as it is the most contemporary derivation, incorporates renal function, is race-agnostic, extends to heart failure, applies from age 30, and agrees closely with FRS, easing transition. Targeted imaging, including coronary artery calcium scoring, may supplement intermediate-risk candidates.